|
|
|---|
Showing posts with label crap. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crap. Show all posts
Monday, April 25, 2011
EAT THE RICH! -- Lying Sack of Crap
I am reposting this link from someone else's Facebook post, even though I don't want to give more publicity to these types of non sequitur types of arguments. Basically, if you don't want to be bothered watching the video, the lying sack of crap makes an argument where he takes the idea of greater taxation on the rich, corporations, etc. to an absurd extreme where we are taking "all" of the corporate profits, rich salaries, etc. for a single year -- "eating the rich".
Beyond being stupid because nobody that I know of is actually suggesting that, I fail to see the logical conclusion of his video. So, since taking 100% of all corporate profits, rich people's salaries for an entire year, etc. would supposedly tank the economy (something that could be argued, but I will let it stand for the moment), does that mean, in your estimation that it is unfair to make the rich pay MORE (but less than 100%) to support the country than the poor?
However, my main question is this, because I have frankly never understood it: how is it that corporations are able to convince the majority (the poor and middle class) to implement economic policies favorable to the minority (the rich) against the explicit economic self-interest of the majority?
For example, the spending cuts to Pell Grants, which cuts funding for nearly 9 million students too poor to pay for college on their own, passed in the last budget by both the Republicans and Obama could have been easily saved by simply letting the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy lapse. However, whenever the idea of raising the taxes on the rich gets proposed, a bunch of jackasses like this guy and the Tea Baggers get on the internet, television, Fox News, etc. and start spreading the type of blatant misinformation and non sequitur logic present in this video. Think about it: Pell Grants are directly beneficial to poor people trying to go to college, many of whom STILL ROUTINELY vote for politicians who vote to cut funding to the program. How on earth does this happen?
If someone could explain the type of thinking that goes on here, I would very much appreciate it, because the mindset has always baffled me.
Labels:
crap,
eat the rich,
funding,
liar,
lying,
pell grant,
poor,
rich,
tea bagger,
youtube
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Four Parodies of David After The Dentist
Ah, David After The Dentist -- the Youtube classic that features a high up 8 year old high on Novocaine. Who ever thought that a little boy could get so famous in life for being on a drug trip on camera? Apparently David's parents, that's who. But, of course, for every video that comes out like this on Youtube, 500 or so parodies are sure to follow. To save time for our esteemed readers, we here at Future Twit have selected out the funniest parodies from those ranks of videos to make David even funnier. Enjoy!
First, the originial (mildly funny):
Second, David After The Divorce (very funny):
Third, David After The Dentist Remix (catchy):
Fourth, David After The Drugs (funniest of all!!!):
We hope that you enjoyed those posts! Stay tuned for more funny videos that we pluck from the crap on Youtube.
First, the originial (mildly funny):
Second, David After The Divorce (very funny):
Third, David After The Dentist Remix (catchy):
Fourth, David After The Drugs (funniest of all!!!):
We hope that you enjoyed those posts! Stay tuned for more funny videos that we pluck from the crap on Youtube.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Top 10 Most Popular YouTube Remixes Of All Time (socialtimes.com)
- Will David After Dentist Kid's Toothbrush Commercial Go Viral? Probably Not. (socialtimes.com)
- The Twit Network Trailer Parody (everyjoe.com)
- Funniest Sports Bloopers Videos: September 2010 Edition (bleacherreport.com)
- Angry Baby 5 Funniest YouTube Videos (techeblog.com)
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Stupid News Stories in the United States Replacing Real News from Other Countries
Too often, news stories from other countries are ignored in by the United State. Take this hostage situation from the Philippines where 8 people died as an example. If I remember correctly, the Philippines story had a shelf life of about 4 hours and was quickly replaced by some sort of crap about John McCain's reelection or Sarah Palin -- the political pseudo celebrities forced upon the American public by Fox News and friends. Note that I would complain about the left's pseudo celebrities too, except they're not in the spotlight as much lately.
I think that a lot of this comes with the rise of the 24 hour news channel. Before, news stations had to cram all of their news into a 30 minute TV nightly news program, so they had to be a bit more selective and report real news. Now, it's almost the opposite effect. News stations can't afford to be selective because they have to run something, so news stations keep running stories, no matter how tiring or trite.
What do you think about the news situation inside the United States? Am I being too harsh, or am I on target?
Maria Venus Raj (impersonator): A Philippina hottie!
![]() |
| Maria Venus Raj |
Related articles by Zemanta
- Miss Philippines Maria Venus Raj Is Top Contender For Miss Universe 2010 (realestateradiousa.com)
- The Aftermath of Manila's Botched Hostage Crisis (time.com)
- Miss Mexico crowned Miss Universe 2010 (atomiurl.com)
Labels:
24 hour news,
8 dead,
crap,
eight,
fox news,
Maria Venus Raj,
news station,
Philippines hostage,
sarah palin
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
